Police seized material from the home of the
Defendant, Mr D, that included:
A device for reading the magnetic stripe on
plastic cards.
A device for reading and writing the memory
chip on modern plastic cards.
A list of credit card numbers written by the
Defendant.
£50,000 in cash.
New and boxed watches valued at about
£50,000.
Laptop computer with software to operate card reading
devices.
Floppy disks containing files of credit card
numbers.
Floppy disks containing software for operating
card reading devices.
Invoices and other documents detailing the
purchase of plastic card printing equipment.
Used foil from the manufacture of credit cards
with card numbers visible in the foil.
Mr D admitted to most of the seized material with
explanations that included:
Mr D's hobby was to collect watches.
Mr D was holding the cash for associates to
enable a prompt response to business opportunities.
Mr D bought and sold equipment for making
credit cards but could not say who his customers were.
Mr D said that the foil and the diskettes were
planted before the raid on his house.
A computer specialist, Mr E, had inspected the
computer equipment and produced a report.
I had numerous conversations with Mr D's
solicitor, Mr S, and and we were quite unable to find anything useful that I (or
anyone else!) could do to assist the defence.
My only written work in this case was a letter
summarising the reasons why I could see nothing that I could usefully do.
The letter is here...